Errors of Enchantment
  • Home
Search the site...

The stupidity of our local planners

Posted by Paul Gessing - July 23, 2012 - Uncategorized
3

What do you call governments that push aside tax-generating developments and promote tax-eating developments? “Stupid” would be one choice term that comes to mind, but “Albuquerque and Bernalillo County” would be other potential terms. Let me explain.

First and foremost, the tax-generating development is the proposed Wal-Mart at Coors and Montano. RGF has consistently advocated for such a development and as a West Side resident, it makes sense. But it has come under fire from the NIMBY crowd and some politicians.

Imagine my surprise when I found out that the City and County are hoping to re-zone a plot of land (called Oxbow Town Center) at Coors and Sequoia for low-income apartments. Now, I don’t care if the apartments are planned for the poor or the Queen of England, but the County is planning to issue $15 million in tax-exempt bonds to help finance the project.

We are assured, as the release above points out, that the developer is merely using the County to access tax-exempt bonds that can be provided by the government, but what happens if the housing market falls apart again and the project stalls? More importantly, why should this development get tax-exempt bonds, but not the rest of us? Sorry, but there is no reason for the rest of us to pay full-freight while this favored developer receives a generous tax subsidy.

At this point, unfortunately, all we have is the blunt instrument of stopping this by denying the zoning change, but the taxpayer subsidy is the real issue here.

3 comments on “The stupidity of our local planners”

  1. Don says:
    July 24, 2012 at 1:11 pm

    Watch out for this developer. He wants our tax money so he can give it to Obama the way Solyndra did. Let’s stop using the tax money of everyone to finance Obama’s corrupt presidency.

    Reply
  2. James A. McClure says:
    July 29, 2012 at 1:00 pm

    The city’s planning department (assuming we actually have one) has been virtually invisible in the Coors-Montano Wal-Mart controversy. Most cities have planners who actively encourage commercial development, but Albuquerque’s policy apparently is to throw developers to the wolves. Except for the ones who receive government subsidies, of course.

    Reply
  3. John Ennis says:
    July 29, 2012 at 3:53 pm

    So much for property rights.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Brought To You By:

rgf_logo
P.O. Box 40336
Albuquerque, NM  87196
Phone: (505)264-6090
Fax: (505)213-0300
E-mail: Info@RioGrandeFoundation.org

"Liberty, Opportunity, Prosperity"

Recent Posts:

  • What Miss Utah should have said
  • In defense of UNMH
  • Of course food stamps (and agriculture subsidies) can be reduced
  • Understanding New Mexico’s graduation rates
  • Scholarship Available for New Mexico student: Bill of Rights Constitutional Academy 2013

Recent Comments:

  • Paul Gessing on How did your legislators vote on freedom during the 2013 legislative session?
  • Jim on How did your legislators vote on freedom during the 2013 legislative session?
  • Paul Gessing on How did your legislators vote on freedom during the 2013 legislative session?
  • anonymous on Contary to Quigley, It’s never too late to adopt free market policies
  • Jim on How did your legislators vote on freedom during the 2013 legislative session?

Archives:

Share Errors of Enchantment:

Share

Actions:

  • Log in
© Copyright 2013:  Errors of Enchantment.   All rights reserved.