<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gov. Martinez right-on in opposing new Internet taxes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.errorsofenchantment.com/2012/07/30/gov-martinez-right-on-in-opposing-new-internet-taxes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.errorsofenchantment.com/2012/07/30/gov-martinez-right-on-in-opposing-new-internet-taxes/</link>
	<description>Why is New Mexico not realizing its potential?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 14:55:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://www.errorsofenchantment.com/2012/07/30/gov-martinez-right-on-in-opposing-new-internet-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-13762</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.errorsofenchantment.com/?p=4536#comment-13762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Appears to me the taxes would be collected in and for the state of origin of purchase, not buyer&#039;s state, or both. So New Mexicans would pay taxes as though they were traveling and buying in a store in New Jersey. Anyone really think the purchaser&#039;s state would derive the income? So likely we would pay a tax to another state, for a long-distance transaction. Not a good idea to require New Mexicans to subsidize stupidity in government in another state; we have enough problems of our own. Looks like a national value-added tax would be a great idea, so we could fund progressive (by definition, collectivist) knuckleheads, nationally!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appears to me the taxes would be collected in and for the state of origin of purchase, not buyer&#8217;s state, or both. So New Mexicans would pay taxes as though they were traveling and buying in a store in New Jersey. Anyone really think the purchaser&#8217;s state would derive the income? So likely we would pay a tax to another state, for a long-distance transaction. Not a good idea to require New Mexicans to subsidize stupidity in government in another state; we have enough problems of our own. Looks like a national value-added tax would be a great idea, so we could fund progressive (by definition, collectivist) knuckleheads, nationally!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morning Word, 07-31-12 &#124; New Mexico Telegram</title>
		<link>http://www.errorsofenchantment.com/2012/07/30/gov-martinez-right-on-in-opposing-new-internet-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-13122</link>
		<dc:creator>Morning Word, 07-31-12 &#124; New Mexico Telegram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 07:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.errorsofenchantment.com/?p=4536#comment-13122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Rio Grande Foundation believes that sales from internet companies like Amazon should remain tax-free. Even the conservative Albuquerque Journal opinion page has noted that this hurts small businesses, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rio Grande Foundation believes that sales from internet companies like Amazon should remain tax-free. Even the conservative Albuquerque Journal opinion page has noted that this hurts small businesses, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
