Comments on: The Chick Fil A Controversy

By: B. Bernado

B. Bernado — Mon, 06 Aug 2012 16:35:42 +0000

Elected officials (mayors etc) have many ways to circumvent the first amendment. In this case the mayor could schedule years of road work or new water pipes or fire drills in front of a business that the mayor wants to bankrupt. History shows us that once the government accumulates enough control of our everyday lives through laws, ordinances, mandates etc it’s only a matter of time until fascism rears it’s head. Socialism always has become fascism in this way. Just look at the history of Germany, Austria, Spain, Russia, China, Argentina etc. Will we be on that road with a Dem takeover in November?

By: Dixie L. Burch

Dixie L. Burch — Sun, 05 Aug 2012 00:05:52 +0000

As an arch-conservative, it will shock people to know I
have absolutely no problem with gay marriages. It does
not affect ME!! My attitude is, who cares.
HOWEVER , I HAVE A HUGE PROBLEM WITH THE
HYPOCRITICAL OBAMA USING IT AS A TOOL TO GET
VOTES…….AND MAYORS AND OTHER ELECTED
OFFICIALS DISCRIMINATING RADICALLY AGAINST
CHRISTIANS just to be on the bandwagon.
I have 4 Chick-Fil-A’s in my frig plus 3 chicken salad
sandwiches, delicious, and look forward to eating them all.

By: Ted Berthelote

Ted Berthelote — Sat, 04 Aug 2012 19:15:54 +0000

Thanks for showcasing FEE and Larry Reed, I have been a FEE fan for over 40 years and I agree with your fondness for Larry Reed. Hope other readers get hooked on FEE.

By: Don

Don — Fri, 03 Aug 2012 17:40:41 +0000

Let them protest. However, they do not have the right to prevent people from getting in, ordering, sitting down, or leaving.

If the protestors create a nuisance with their stupid kiss-in, the restaurant has a right to order them out and issue criminal trespass notifications in front of the police so they can’t come back.

We don’t have to put up with lawbreaking. Protests are one thing. Crimes are another.